Page 124 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS
P. 124

123 áÑgƒªdÉH ±GôàY’G

Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and
  natural sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance
  of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 200–210.

Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free
  Press.

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. London:
  Praeger.

Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development. Vol 2. Essays
  on moral development. New York: Harper and Row.

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Morelock, M. J. (2000). Gender differences
  in engineering and the physical sciences among the gifted:Aninorganic-
  organic distinction. In K. A. Heller, F. J.Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Sub-
  otnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 203–
  212). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

Luthar, S. S., Zigler, E., & Goldstein, D. (1992). Psychosocial adjustment
  among intellectually gifted adolescents: The role of cognitive-develop-
  mental and experiential factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psy-
  chiatry, 33, 361–373.

Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Westport,
  CT: Greenwood.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, O., Gonzales, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A.,
  O’Connor, K. M., et al. (1999). Third International Mathematics and Sci-
  ence Study. International Mathematics Report. Findings from the IEA’s
  repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the
  eighth grade. Retrieved July 14, 2002, from http://isc.bc.edu/tmss1999i/
  math achievement report. html

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at
  risk. The imperative for educational reform.Areport to the nation and the
  Secretary of Education; United States Department of Education. Wash-
  ington, DC: April, 1983. http://www.ed. gov/pubs/NatAtRisk

Northamptonshire County Council. (1994). The more able child. Northamp-
  ton, England: NIAS.

Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excel-
  lence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: U.S.
  Department of Education.
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129