Page 368 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS

367 á«YGóH’E G áÑgƒªdG

Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. (1993). Judgments of originality and appro-
priateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differ-
ences, 15, 537–546.

Runco, M. A., & Richards, R. (Eds.). (1998). Eminent creativity, everyday
creativity, and health. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Runco, M. A., Johnson, D.,&Gaynor, J. R. (1999). The judgmental bases
of creativity and implications for the study of gifted youth. In A. Fishkin,
B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Creativity in youth: Re-
search and methods (pp. 113–141). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2000). Development and psycho-
metric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research
Journal, 13, 393–400.

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius. New York: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1995). Exceptional personal influence: An integrative
paradigm. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 371–376.

Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36,
311–322.

Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth-grade
slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 195–199.

Wallace, D. B. (1991). The genesis and microgenesis of sudden insight in
the creation of literature. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 41–50.

Wallach, M. A., &Wing, C. (1969). The talented student. New York: Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.

Weber R. (1996). Toward a language of invention and synthetic thinking.
Creativity Research Journal.

Weeks, D., & James, J. (1995). Eccentrics. London:Weidenfeld & Nicol-
son.

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no infer-
ences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.