Page 50 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS
P. 50
49 »¶Ø∏dG hCG /h »°VÉjôdG êÉàæà°S’G »a ¿ƒ¨HÉædG ÜÉÑ°ûdG
™LGôªdG
Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (1999).
Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds in-
cremental validity to abilities:Adiscriminant analysis of educational out-
comes over a 10-year interval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91,
777–789.
Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American
Psychologist, 30 (2), 140–151.
Barnett, L. B., & Juhasz, S. E. (2001). The Johns Hopkins University tal-
ent searches today. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 96–99.
Bayley, N. (1955). On the growth of intelligence. American Psychologist,
10, 805–818.
Bayley, N. (1970). Development of mental abilities. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),
Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1163–
2109). New York: Wiley.
Bell, E. T. (1937). Men of mathematics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Benbow,C.P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science
of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among stu-
dents in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educa-
tional Psychology, 84, 51–61.
Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000).
Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Their status 20 years
later. Psychological Science, 11, 474–480.
Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., & Suchy, B. (1996). Impact of the SMPY
model and programs from the perspective of the participant. In C. P.
Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and so-
cial issues (pp. 266–300). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University
Press.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.) (1983). Academic precocity: As-
pects of its development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How “equity”
can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Pol-
icy, and Law, 2, 249–292.
