Page 158 - CreativityGiftedness

157 ?¿ÉaOGôàe äÉ«°VÉjôdG »a ´GóHE’Gh áÑgƒªdG πg :™HGôdG π°üØdG

Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Enhancing Creativity . In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook
Of Creativity (Pp. 392–430). Cambridge University Press .

Plucker, J., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why Creativity Is Domain General , Why It
Looksdomain Specific, And Why The Distinction Does Not Matter. In R. J.
Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From Potential
To Realization (Pp. 153–168). Washington Dc: American Psychological As-
sociation.

Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (2000). From Case Studies To Robust Generalizations :
An Approach To The Study Of Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook
Of Creativity (Pp. 213–225). Cambridge University Press.

Poincaré, H. (1948). Science And Method . New York: Dover.
Polya, G. (1945). How To Solve It. Princeton , Nj: Princeton University Press.
Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics And Plausible Reasoning : Induction And Analogy In

Mathematics (Vol. Ii). Princeton University Press.
Presmeg, N. C. ( 1986). Visualization And Mathematical Giftedness . Educational

Studies In Mathematics, 17, 297–311.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What Makes Giftedness ? Reexamining A Definition. Phi Delta

Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The Three-Ring Conception Of Giftedness: A Develop-

mental Model For Creative Productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. David-
son (Eds.),Conceptions Of Giftedness (Pp. 332–357). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Ripple, R. E. (1989). Ordinary Creativity , Contemporary Educational Psychology,
14, 189–202.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1989). Discovering. Cambridge, Ma : Harvard University
Press.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1996). The Sciences And Arts Share A Common Creative
Aesthetic . In A. I. Tauber (Ed.), The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics And Sci-
ence (Pp. 49–82). Netherlands: Kluwer.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2000). Art Advances Science . Nature, 407, 134.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2001). Music, Science , And Creativity. Leonardo, 34, 63–68.