Page 69 - sciencestrategiesforstudent
P. 69
ÚHƒgƒŸG ÜÓ£∏d Ωƒ∏©dG ¢ùjQóJ äÉ«é«JGΰSGE 68
Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2009).
Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S.
fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009-
001 Revised). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Re-
trieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdf
Hébert, T. (2011). Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students.
Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Hubisz, J. L. (2003). Choosing middle school science textbooks: Is North Carolina
failing its students? Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Education Alliance. Retrieved
from http://jove.geol.niu.edu/faculty/kitts/GEOL301/hubiszscitextreview.pdf
Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding
boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20-28.
Kim, K. H. (2008). Underachievement and creativity: Are gifted underachievers highly cre-
ative? Creativity Research Journal, 20, 234-242. doi:10.1080/10400410802060232
Lee, S.-Y., Matthews, M. S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008). A national picture of
talent search and talent search educational programs. Gifted Child Quarterly,
52, 55-69. doi:10.1177/001698620731115
Matthews, M. S. (2006). Encouraging your child’s science talent: The involved par-
ents’ guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Matthews, M. S., & McBee, M. T. (2007). School factors and the underachievement
of gifted students in a talent search summer program. Gifted Child Quarterly,
51, 167-181. doi:10.1177/0016986207299473
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted
students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47,
144-154. doi:10.1177/001698620304700205
Morisano, D., & Shore, B. M. (2010). Can personal goal setting tap the potential of
the gifted underachiever? Roeper Review, 32, 249-258. doi:10.1080/027831
93.2010.508156
National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators:
Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital (Report #NSB-10-
33). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
