Page 1447 - theCambridgehandbookofintelligence1
P. 1447

AÉcòs ∏d êójôѪ«c á©eÉL π«dO 1446

Luria, A. R. (1970). The functional organization of the brain. Scientific American, 222, 66-
         78.

Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. London, UK:
         Penguin.

Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of
         creativity (pp. 137-152). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on
         the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37,
         1-10.

Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review,
         69, 220-232.

Mednick, S. A. (1968). The Remote Associates Test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213-
         214.

Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T. (1967). Examiner s manual: Remote Associates Test. Bos-
         ton, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Meeker, M. N. (1969). The structure of intellect:Its interpretation and uses. Columbus, OH:
         Merrill.

Mumford, M. D., Lonergan, D. C., & Scott, G. M. (2002). Evaluating creative ideas: Pro-
         cesses, standards, and context. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22,
         21-30.

Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991).
         Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-
         122.

Naglieri, J. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2001). Understanding intelligence, giftedness, and creativ-
         ity using PASS theory. Roeper Review, 23, 151- 156.

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict
         creativity in the arts and sciences. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have
         commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19,
         957-961.

Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance s (1958 to present)
         longitudinal study data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn t creativity more important to
         Educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity re-
         search. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96.
   1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452