Page 349 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS

áÑgƒªdG º«gÉØe 348

Kangas, J., & Bradway, K. (1971). Intelligence at middle age: A thirty-
eight-year follow-up. Developmental Psychology, 5, 333–337.

Lohman, D. F. (in press). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identify-
ing academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child
Quarterly.

Lubinski, D.,Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top
1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Ap-
plied Psychology, 86, 718–729.

McNemar, Q. (1942). The revision of the Stanford–Binet scale. Boston:
Houghton- Mifflin.

Morelock, M. J. (1996). On the nature of giftedness and talent: Imposing
order on chaos. Roeper Review, 19, 4–12.

Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of
gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT).
Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 155–160.

Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (Eds.). (2002).
The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we
know?Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Olszewski-Kubilius,P. (2002). Parenting practices that promote talent de-
velopment, creativity, and optimal adjustment. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis,
N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.). (2002), The social and emo-
tional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 205–212).
Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Pletan, M. D., Robinson, N. M., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1995).
Parents’ observations of kindergartners who are advanced in mathe-
matical reasoning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 30–44.

Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A devel-
opmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Da-
vidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge, Eng-
land: Cambridge University Press.

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2000). The schoolwide enrichment model.
In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), In-
ternational handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 367–382). New York:
Elsevier.

Robinson, N. M. (2003). Two wrongs do not make a right: Sacrificing the
needs of academically talented students does not solve society’s un-
solved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 321–328.