Page 45 - GiftedEducationProgrammingStandards
P. 45
ÚHƒgƒŸG á«HôJ á›ôH ÒjÉ©e 44
environments for cross-cultural learning and student engagement (pp. 1–18).
Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
Harris, B., Plucker, J. A., Rapp, K. E., & Martinez, R. S. (2009). Identifying gifted
and talented English language learners: A case study. Journal for the Education
of the Gifted, 32, 368–393.
Hartman, H. J. (2001). Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research
and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hébert, T. P. (1991). Meeting the affective needs of bright boys through bibliotherapy.
Roeper Review, 13, 207–212.
Hensel, N. H. (1991). Social leadership skills in young children. Roeper Review,
14, 4–6.
Hertzog, N. B. (2005). Equity and access: Creating general education classrooms
responsive to potential giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,
29, 213–257.
Johnsen, S. K. (2006). New national standards for teachers of gifted and talented
students. Tempo, 26(3), 26–31.
Johnsen, S. K. (2011a). A comparison of the Texas State Plan for the Education
of Gifted/Talented Students and the 2010 NAGC Pre-K–Grade 12 Gifted
Programming Standards. Tempo, 31(1), 10–28.
Johnsen, S. K. (Ed.). (2011b). Identifying gifted students: A practical guide. Waco,
TX: Prufrock Press.
Johnsen, S. K., Haensly, P. A., Ryser, G. R., & Ford, R. F. (2002). Changing
general education classroom practices to adapt for gifted students. Gifted
Child Quarterly, 46, 45–63.
Johnsen, S. K., & Johnson, K. (2007). Independent study program (2nd ed.). Waco,
TX: Prufrock Press.
Johnsen, S. K., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Robinson, A. (2008). Using the national
gifted education standards for university teacher preparation programs.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kitano, M. K., & Lewis, R. B. (2005). Resilience and coping: Implications for gifted
children and youth at risk. Roeper Review, 27, 200–205.