Page 49 - GiftedEducationProgrammingStandards
P. 49
ÚHƒgƒŸG á«HôJ á›ôH ÒjÉ©e 48
Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. G. (2005). Extending learning through mentorships.
In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the
gifted (2nd ed., pp. 473–518). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects.
American Psychologist, 55, 151–158.
Stiggins, R. (2008). Assessment manifesto: A call for the development of balanced
assessment systems. Portland, OR: ETS Assessment Training Institute.
Tannenbaum, A. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In N. Colangelo &
G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 27–44). Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Tomlinson, C. A. (Ed.). (2004). Differentiation for gifted and talented students.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
U.S. Department of Education (2008). A nation accountable: Twenty-five years
after a nation at risk. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.
ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/accountable/accountable.pdf/
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004). Curriculum for gifted and talented students. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (Ed.). (2006). Serving gifted learners beyond the traditional
classroom: A guide to alternative programs and services. Waco, TX: Prufrock
Press.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (Ed.). (2007). Alternative assessments with gifted and talented
students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (Ed.). (2009). Patterns and profiles of promising learners
from poverty. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Williams, E. R., & Baber, C. R. (2007). Building trust through culturally reciprocal
home-school-community collaboration from the perspective of African-
American parents. Multicultural Perspectives, 9(2), 3–9.
Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the effects of full-time vs. part-
time educational programs for the gifted: Affective outcomes and policy
considerations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 413–427.
Zirkel, S. (2008). The influence of multicultural educational practices on student
outcomes and intergroup relations. Teachers College Record, 110, 1147–1181.
