Page 49 - STEMEducation

ø«HƒgƒªdG áÑ∏£∏d (STEM) º«à°S ègÉæe º«ª°üJ 48

Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T.
(2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban
systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063-1080.

Metz, K. E. (2008). Narrowing the gulf between the practices of science and the elementary
school science classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 138-161.

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What
is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984-2002. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474-496.

Murphy, C., Neil, P., & Beggs, J. (2007). Primary science teacher confidence revisited: Ten
years on. Educational Research, 49, 415-430.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington,
DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices,
crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New
K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral
and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators:
Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital (NSB- 10-33). Retrieved from
http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2010/ nsb1033

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Peers, C. E., Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2003). Supports and concerns for teacher
professional growth during the implementation of a science curriculum innovation.
Research in Science Education, 33, 89-110.

Raghavan, R., Cohen-Regev, S., & Strobel, S. A. (2001). Student outcomes in a local systemic
change project. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 417-426.