Page 68 - STEMEducation
P. 68
67 ájƒfÉãdG á∏MôªdG »a Ωƒ∏©dG ¢ùjQóJ :ådÉãdG π°üØdG
librarians and teachers cultivating curiosity together (pp. 53-70). Santa Barbara, CA:
Libraries Unlimited.
Langdon, D, McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011, July). STEM: Good
jobs now and for the future. U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics
Administration, Office of the Chief Economist, Issue Brief #03-11. Retrieved from
http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/ files/reports/documents/stemfinalyjuly14_1.pdf
National Academy of Sciences. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm. Washington, D.C.:
National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www. nap.edu/catalog.php?record_
id=11463
National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying
and developing our nation’s human capital. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Novak, J. D. (2005). Results and implications of a 12-year longitudinal study of science
concept learning. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 23-40.
Omdal, S. N., & Richards, M. R. E. (2008). Academic competitions. In Plucker, J. A. &
Callahan, C. M. (Eds.), Critcal issues and practices in gifted education, (pp. 5-14).
Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Ozturk, M. A., & Debelak, C. (2008). Affective benefits from academic competitions for
middle school gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 31(2), 48-53.
Paul, R. (1992). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing
world. Berkeley, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis
of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382-396.
Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added
Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implications for educational evaluation and
research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247-256.
