Page 66 - STEMEducation
P. 66

65 ájƒfÉãdG á∏MôªdG »a Ωƒ∏©dG ¢ùjQóJ :ådÉãdG π°üØdG

á«dÉ©dG äGQó≤dG …hP ÜÓ£∏d iôNC’G á«Ø°UÓdG èeGôÑdGh ᫪∏©dG äÉ≤HÉ°ùªdG øY åëHG .5
                                                    .∂à≤£æe »a

                         ¢TÉ≤æ∏d á∏Ä°SGC

»a OQGƒdG ¢ùchôHh ¢ùchôH πªY QÉWGE ™e ∂à°SQóe »a Ωƒ∏©dG ∫ƒ°üa ≥HÉ£àJ ∞«c ∞°U .1
ä’Éée ᫪gGC Oóu `Mh ,á«FÉæÑdG ±ƒØ°üdG ±ô`¨H ¢UÉîdG á£≤f 12 ø`e ¿ƒ`μªdG π`°üØdG

                                        .É¡Mô°TGh ,á°ù«FôdG ø«°ùëàdG
∂JGôÑN ∞°U ,∂Ø°U »`a á∏μ`°ûªdG hGC ´hô`°ûªdG ≈∏Y ºFÉ≤dG º∏©àdG ≥Ñ£J Ók ©a â`æc GPGE .2
∞«c ∞°U ,ø«à≤jô£dG ø`e Éjv GC ≥Ñ£J øμJ ºd GPGE h ,ø«`°ùëàdG πLGC øe õ`«côàdG Ö`fGƒLh

                             .áæ«©e ¢ùjQóJ IóMh ΩGóîà°SÉH AóÑdG ∂æμªj
IôaGƒàªdG á`«Ø°UÓdG á£`°ûf’C Gh Ωƒ∏©dG ≈`∏Y IõcôªdG áeó≤àªdG äGQô`≤ªdG äGQÉ`«N É`e .3
áÑgƒªdG ôjƒ£J ºYód É`¡H ΩÉ«≤dG øμªj »àdG iôNC’G AÉ«`°TC’G Ée ?∂à≤£æe »`a ÜÓ`£∏d
´Éæ°U ≈dG É¡©aQGh ,á∏°üØe á«°UƒJh äÉjƒdhC’ÉH áªFÉb ™°V ?∂à≤£æe »a ÜÓ£∏d ᫪∏©dG

                                               .∂à°SQóe »a QGô≤dG

                           ™LGôŸG

Brooks.J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). The case for Constructivist classrooms. Alexandria,
      VA: ASCD.

Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM
      fields statistical analysis report. Institute for Educational Statistics: National Center for
      Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf

Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hilger, N., Saez., E., Schanzenbach, D. W., & Yagan, D. (2011).
      How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from Project
      Star. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1593-1660.

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools
      hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City: University of Iowa, The Connie
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71