Page 230 - BeyondGiftedEducation
P. 230

229 ™LGôŸG áªFÉb

        In J. L. Van Tassel-Baska (Ed.),Alternative assessments with gifted and tal-
        ented students (pp. 41-66). Waco,TX: Prufrock Press.
Matthews,M. S. (2006). Benefits and drawbacks of state-level assessments for
        gifted students: NCLB and standardized testing. Duke Gifted Letter,7(1)
        [electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.tip.duke.edu/node/827
Matthews,M. S. (2007). Talent search programs. In C. M. Callahan & J. A. Pluck-
        er (Eds.),Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 641-653).
        Waco,TX: Prufrock Press.
Matthews,M. S.,& Kirsch,L. (2011). Evaluating gifted identification practice: Ap-
        titude testing and linguistically diverse learners. Journal of Applied School
        Psychology,27,155-180. doi:10.1080/15377903.2011.565281
McBee,M. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources by race and socioeco-
        nomic status. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,17,103-111.
McBee,M. (2010a). Examining the probability of identification for gifted programs
        for students in Georgia elementary schools: A multilevel path analysis study.
        Gifted Child Quarterly,54,283-297.
McBee,M. (2010b). Modeling outcomes with floor or ceiling effects: An in-
        troduction to the Tobit model. Gifted Child Quarterly,54,314-320.
        doi:10.1177/001698621037909
McBee,M. T.,McCoach,D. B.,Peters,S. J.,& Matthews,M. S. (2012). The case for a
        schism: Commentary on Subotnik,Olszewski-Kubilius,and Worrell (2011).
        Gifted Child Quarterly,56,210-214.
McBee,M. T.,Peters,S. J.,& Waterman,C. (in press). Combining scores in multi-
        ple-criteria assessment systems: The impact of combination rule. Gifted
        Child Quarterly.
McCall,R. B.,Appelbaum,M. I.,& Hogarty,P. S. (1973). Developmental changes
        in mental performance. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
        Development,38(3,Serial No. 150),1-84. doi:10.2307/1165768
Naglieri,J. A. (2003). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (2nd ed.). San Antonio,TX:
        Pearson.
Naglieri,J. A.,& Ford. D. Y. (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of gifted mi-
        nority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted
        Child Quarterly,47,155-160.
Naglieri,J. A.,& Ford,D. Y. (2005). Increasing minority children’s participation in
        gifted classes using the NNAT: A response to Lohman. Gifted Child Quar-
        terly,49,29-36. doi:10.1177/001698620504900104
National Association for Gifted Children. (2008). The role of assessment in the
        identification of gifted students. Washington,DC: Author. Retrieved from
        http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=4022
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235