Page 293 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS
P. 293

áÑgƒªdG º«gÉØe  292

Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science
  Monthly, 62, 359–377.

Dash, J. (1973). A life of one’s own: Three gifted women and the men
  they married. New York: Paragon.

Dash, J. (1988). A life of one’s own. New York: Paragon.

Diamond, A. (1986). Guests at the table: Feminists and contracts. Thought
  and Action, 2, 123–34.

Gabor, A. (1995). Einstein’s wife:Work and marriage in the lives of five
  great twenty-first century women. New York: Viking.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and wom-
  en’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R.
  J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp.
  247–260). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hardwick, J. (1990). An immodest violet. London: Andre Deutsch.

Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Re-
  search Journal, 9(4), 295–306.

Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young wom-
  en: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quar-
  terly, 32(2), 254–260.

Hutchinson, E. J. (1930).Women and the Ph.D. Greensboro, NC: College
  forWomen.

Kennedy, C. J., & McConnell, M. (2001). Generally speaking. New York:
  Warner.

Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psy-
  chology.

Kirschenbaum, R. J., & Reis, S. M. (1997). Conflicts in creativity: Tal-
  ented female artists. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2&3), 251–263.

Knights, D., & Richards, W. (2003). Sex discrimination in UK academia.
  Gender, Work, and Organization, 10(2), 213–238.

Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
  University Press.
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298