Page 293 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS
P. 293
áÑgƒªdG º«gÉØe 292
Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science
Monthly, 62, 359–377.
Dash, J. (1973). A life of one’s own: Three gifted women and the men
they married. New York: Paragon.
Dash, J. (1988). A life of one’s own. New York: Paragon.
Diamond, A. (1986). Guests at the table: Feminists and contracts. Thought
and Action, 2, 123–34.
Gabor, A. (1995). Einstein’s wife:Work and marriage in the lives of five
great twenty-first century women. New York: Viking.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and wom-
en’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R.
J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp.
247–260). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hardwick, J. (1990). An immodest violet. London: Andre Deutsch.
Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Re-
search Journal, 9(4), 295–306.
Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young wom-
en: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quar-
terly, 32(2), 254–260.
Hutchinson, E. J. (1930).Women and the Ph.D. Greensboro, NC: College
forWomen.
Kennedy, C. J., & McConnell, M. (2001). Generally speaking. New York:
Warner.
Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psy-
chology.
Kirschenbaum, R. J., & Reis, S. M. (1997). Conflicts in creativity: Tal-
ented female artists. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2&3), 251–263.
Knights, D., & Richards, W. (2003). Sex discrimination in UK academia.
Gender, Work, and Organization, 10(2), 213–238.
Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.