Page 72 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS
P. 72

71 πØ£dG áÑgƒªd áHÉéà°S’G êPƒªf

Renzulli, J. S., & Smith, L. H. (1978). The compactor. Mansfield Center,
  CT: Creative Learning Press.

Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–
  687.

Shavinina, L. V., & Kholodnaja, M. A. (1996). The cognitive experience as
  a psychological basis of intellectual giftedness. Journal for the Educa-
  tion of the Gifted, 20(1), 3–35.

Shore, B. M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative difference
  in how gifted children think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Tal-
  ents unfolding: Cognition and development.Washington, DC: American
  Psychological Association.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally
  well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Con-
  ceptions of giftedness (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University
  Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1981).Acomponential theory of intelligence. Gifted Child
  Quarterly, 25, 86–93.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelli-
  gence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1986).Atriarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R.
  J. Sternberg &J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223–
  243). Cambridge, England:

Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1995).Atriarchic approach to giftedness. Storrs, CT: Na-
  tional Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

Sternberg, R. J. (2000a). Identifying and developing creative giftedness.
  Roeper Review, 23, 60–64.

Sternberg, R. J. (2000b). Giftedness as developing expertise. In K. A.
  Heller, F. J. MÖnks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Interna-
  tional handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 55–66). Oxford,
  England: Elsevier.

Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1998). Cognitive conceptions of exper-
  tise and their relations to giftedness. In R. C. Friedman & K. B. Rogers
  (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on gifted-
  ness (pp. 177–191). Washington, DC: American Psychological Associa-
  tion.
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77