Page 73 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS
P. 73
áÑgƒªdG º«gÉØe 72
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J.
Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52).
Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In N.
Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.,
pp. 27–42). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). Giftedness: The ultimate instrument for good
and evil. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik
(Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.). New
York: Elsevier.
Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcel, J., Lappein, J., &
Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high po-
tenial and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer-
sity.
Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. Ameri-
can Psychologist, 52, 1070–1081.
Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Psy-
chologist, 55, 159–169.
