Page 243 - ibdaa
P. 243

Ÿ-b<¡~9¡EH Ÿ-bJxƒF   ˆ*]+(°* 242

‡+b~zD* –~|ŒD*     

¤sJ4bgD* 6b£D* nž›E š]sg~z- ,x£jC ib~6*42 &* f£pD* ¤AH  lH]pD* 42bF 5HxcD*H ¡˜~zD* I¡g~zE ¢D(* —¡~8¡D* œ’D
       ixcD*&   2*xA&°* œE –£•B 2]< bžmg›J f£<*]+°( * $b£~7°& * f£cDb= &* ¢•< |›J ¥wD* Lotka b’-¡D ¡FbB ¢•< i]C*&

                                          b†K E fcG¡˜D*H ,HxjD* ‡J5¡- ¡FbD* *wG ~|JH         ¡g›˜Jb~6

                      œ£F*¡D*H f£sJ4bgD* 4b.°% *

                                 Historical Effects and Laws

 ¡g›˜Jb~6  "$bCwD* I¡B ¦†+ ‡E bK £~z’< bK c~6b›- d~6b›gJ  b›K £†E ÉK 12 ¡c~z’J œJwD* 2*xA°& * 2]<"  Lotka b’-¡D ¡FbB t 

                                                                                   8  &*    
2]< ~|JH fJxgE¡£•ccD* ib~6*4]D* ¤A fEbžD* œ£F*¡D* ]0&* ]†J  ¤†£+xgD* 4wm•D zJ*x+ ¡FbB H*& Price zJ*x+ ¡FbB t 
—É1H ¤<¡~9¡E –0 ¥&* ¤A obgF°( * ¥xJy= œ£ŒD¡' ˜D* 2]<" ¡FbD* *wG —¡JH  f£<¡~9¡˜D* —¡pD* ¤A obgF°( * ¥xJy= œ£ŒD¡' ˜D*

                8  &*     ¡g›˜Jb~6  "–pD* *wG ¤A œ£ŒD¡' ˜•D ¤Db˜/°( * ]†•D ¤†£+xgD* 4wmD* bcK Jx- ¥Hb~zJ f›£†E ,xgA
                       &*      ¡-x£E  "*K xA H2*2yJ $*xŒD*H  ¢›= H2*2yJ $b£›=&°*"  Mathew x.&* t 

         "f0ÉD* ib<*xg1°*H ,]J]mD* 4b’A&°* œE f<¡›E f•£’~{- ¢D(* ]0*H ˆ*xg1* ¥2'¡J ]B"  ‘É:(°* x.&* t 
         "¤<*]+(°* ”¡•~zD* “D3 ¤A b˜+ ”¡•~zD* œ< x£c†gD* ¢•< ¤’£-bE*42 x.&* bžD ib†B¡gD*"  ¡£Db˜m+ x.*&  t

                   "x1°% —bmE œE œJbcgJ ŸF&* ™=4 ¤<*]+°( * –˜†•D –jE*& x˜< ]/¡J"  Planck f£~9xA  t

                    Ÿ)Hb~zEH ¤sJ4bgD* nž›˜D* fJ2H]pE

        LIMITATIONS AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE HISTORICAL APPROACH

¢g0 w1%bE ”b›G &* b˜C  fAxpE b˜+4H f•˜g’E x£= ¡’- bE bcK Db= ibFb£cDbA  ÉK ž~6 z£D ¤sJ4bgD* –£•pgD* &* ]C'¡˜D* œE
¡pF fcG¡˜•D f£<¡~9¡˜D* i*x~7'¡˜D* Žxp›- ]B —bj˜D* –£c~6 ¢•†A  ¤sJ4bgD* 6b£D* –jE  f£<¡~9¡˜D* f£sJ4bgD* nGb›˜D* ¢•<
bEH  `/bŒE –’~{+ x£‰g- ]B f†˜~zD* *& °Q *(  f›£†E f£›E5 ,xgA ¤A ¤c†~7 ]£~8x+ ‡g˜g- ]B $b£~7°& * ¦†+ *& ™=4H  ibmg›˜D*

                    Ž*xpF°* *wG ¢•< —bjE °*( ‡˜gm˜D* ¤A f£<*]+(°* ™ž-bEbž~6*( ™=4 œ£<]c˜D* ¢•< ™’pD* ,$b~6(*

                              f£/bgF°( *

                                            PRODUCTIVITY

bK ~6b£E –’~{J ° bž›E ¥*& bC *( H  ¤<¡~9¡EH ‡AbF b˜ž›E ÉK C &° fJb›†+ f£c†~{D*H f£/bgF(ÉD 6b£E –C x~zŒF *& ¤‰c›J
b›•£•p- f/42 œE ]p- hFbC *( H bK ~¦J*& ,]£ŒE ˆb›B(°* ¢•< ,4]D*H x£.&bgD*H f£c†~{D* &* b˜C  Ÿ-*3 ]0 ¤A ˆ*]+(ÉD *K x~7bcE
H&*  —bŒ:°& * ˆ*]+*( œ< ibJxƒF rx: ¤A ]<b~z- ° ]B bž›’D  œJ54bcD* 8bs~7&°* f~6*42 ¤A bž›E bJK *& š]sg~zF ]A  ¤sJ4bgD*

                                                     524b~{gJ4H ¡’F4  f£<*]+°( * f£•˜†D* H&* ¤E¡£D* ˆ*]+(°*
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248