Page 234 - ModernCurriculumforGiftedandAdvanced

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief
State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English
language arts. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.
corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of
Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for
mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.
corestandards.org/Math

Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation
science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National
Academies Press.

Reis, S. M., Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The
complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students.
Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2005). Curriculum compacting: An easy start to
differentiating for high potential students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defen-
sible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative
Learning Press.

Renzulli, J. S. (1984). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental
model for promoting creative productivity (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service ED249728). Retrieved from ERIC database.

Taylor, L. A. (1995). Undiscovered Edisons: Fostering talents of vocational-techni-
cal students (RM95214). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National
Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

Tomlinson, C. A. (1993). Independent study: A flexible tool for encouraging
academic and personal growth. Middle School Journal, 25(1), 55–59.

Westberg, K. L. (1995). Meeting the needs of the gifted in the regular class-
room: The practices of exemplary teachers and schools. Gifted Child Today,
18(1) 27–29, 41.

233 º∏t ©àdG ójôØJh ,á«YGóH’E G á«LÉàfE’Gh ,á∏≤à°ùŸG çƒëÑdG :™°SÉàdG π°üØdG