Page 165 - STEMEducation
P. 165

ø«HƒgƒªdG áÑ∏£∏d (STEM) º«à°S ègÉæe º«ª°üJ 164

McClain, M. & Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States
      today: A look at state definitions, policies and practices. Journal of Applied School
      Psychology, 28(1), 59-88.

McCoach, D. B., Rambo, K., & Welsh, M. (2013). Assessing the growth of gifted students.
      Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 56-67.

Missett, T., & Brunner, M. (2013). The use of traditional assessment tools for identifying
      gifted students. In M. Callahan & H. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted
      education considering multiple perspectives. (pp. 105-111) New York, NY: Routledge.

National Association of Gifted Children (2008). Position statement: The role of assessments
      in the identification of gifted students. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from: http://
      www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position%20 Statement/Assessment%20Position%20
      Statement.pdf

National Association for Gifted Children. (2013). NAGC-CEC Teacher Preparation Standards
      in Gifted and Talented Education. Retrieved from: http://www.nagc.org/resources-
      publications/resources/national-standards-gifted-and-talented-education

National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in
      the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Newcombe, N. (2010). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving
      spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29-43.

Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E.
      (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist,
      67, 130-159.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010, Sept.). Prepare and
      inspire: K-12 science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education for America’s
      future. Retrieved from http://www. whitehousegov/ostp/pcast

Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to.
      International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-99.
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170