Page 163 - STEMEducation

ø«HƒgƒªdG áÑ∏£∏d (STEM) º«à°S ègÉæe º«ª°üJ 162

á«ZGôØdG IQó≤dG º««≤J ≈∏Y IóYÉ°ùª∏d É¡eGóîà°SG øμªj ,á∏μ°ûªdG ≈∏Y á«æÑe ᪡e Qƒu W .3
.ÉgóLp hCG

…hP ÜÓ£dG ≈dGE ±ôt `©à∏d ¬eóîà`°ùf hGC º««≤àdGh »dÉëdG è`¡æªdG Rõ©f ¿GC É`ææμªj ∞`«c .4
?(º«à°S) ä’Éée »a á«dÉ©dG äGQó≤dG

™LGôŸG

Andersen, L. (2014). Visual-spatial ability: Important in STEM, ignored in gifted education.
Roeper Review, 36(2), 114-121.

Bell, P. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Coxon, S. (2012). The malleability of spatial ability under treatment of a First LEGO League-
Based robotics simulation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 291-316.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and
the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

Dweck. C. (2009). Self-theories and lessons for giftedness: A reflective conversation. In T.
Balchin, B. Hymer, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge international companion
to gifted education (pp. 308-316). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated
from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms.
Intelligence, 45, 81-103.

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice
in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.

Harlan, J. M., Pruet, S., Van Haneghan, J. P., & Dean, M. (2014). Using curriculum-integrated
engineering modules to improve understanding of math and science content and STEM
attitudes in middle grade students. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/public/
conferences/32/papers/10284/view