Page 174 - bestpracticingiftededucation

173 êÉ¡æŸG §¨°V :ô°ûY ådÉãdG π°üØdG

Reis, S. M., & Westberg, K. L. (1994). The impact of staff development on teachers’
ability to modify curriculum for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child
Quarterly, 38, 125–135.

Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J. M., & Purcell, J. H. (1998). Curriculum
compacting and achievement test scores: What does the research say? Gifted
Child Quarterly, 42, 123–129.

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2004). Curriculum compacting: A research-based dif-
ferentiation strategy for culturally diverse talented students. In D. Boothe &
J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in
gifted education (pp. 87–100). Waco, TX: Prufrock.

Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L., & Reis, S. M. (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essen-
tial strategy for working with gifted students. The Elementary School Jour-
nal, 82,185–194.

Stamps, L. S. (2004). The effectiveness of curriculum compacting in first grade class-
rooms. Roeper Review, 27, 31–42.

Stanley, J. C. (1978). SMPY’s DT-PI mentor model: Diagnostic testing followed by
prescriptive instruction. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin, 4(10), 7–8.

Taylor, B. M., & Frye, B. J. (1988). Pretesting: Minimize time spent on skill work for
the intermediate readers. The Reading Teacher, 42, 100–103.

Usiskin, Z. (1987). Why elementary algebra can, should and must be an eighth-grade
course for average students. Mathematics Teacher, 80, 428–438.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (1989). Appropriate curriculum for the gifted. In J. F. Feldhusen,
J. VanTassel-Baska, & K. Seeley (Eds.), Excellence in educating the gifted (pp.
175–191). Denver, CO: Love.

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving
gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44, 211–