Page 326 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS
P. 326
325 áÑgƒª∏d çÓãdG äÉ≤∏ëdG Ωƒ¡Øe
Cox, C. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 2. The early men-
tal traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of dis-
covery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determina-
tion in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Moti-
vation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational
Psychologist, 26, 325– 346.
Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individu-
al. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55–73.
DuBois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Gardener, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligenc-
es. New York: Basic Books.
Gardener, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the
21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Gowan, J. C. (1978, July 25). New directions for gifted education. Paper
presented at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Guilford, J. P. (1964). Some new looks at the nature of creative process-
es. In M.
Fredrickson&H. Gilliksen (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychol-
ogy (pp. 42– 66). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: Mc-
Graw-Hill.
Harmon, L. R. (1963). The development of a criterion of scientific compe-
tence. In C.W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recog-
nition and development (pp. 147–165). New York:Wiley.
Helson, R.,&Crutchfield, R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: The creative re-
searcher and the average Ph.D. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psy-
chology, 34, 250–257.
