Page 290 - ibdaa
P. 290
289 -b<¡~9¡EH -bJxF *]+°( *
~6bgD* ~|D*
Tolerance 9¡D* p- 6b£E &* ¢< ÉK £D2 (Tegano, 1990) "¡Fbm£-" ]B ]BH i*4b£sD* E f~6*H f<¡mE
2*xA&°* ]< ¤<*]+(°* e¡~6°& * x~7¡' + bcK /¡E b:K bc-4* c-xJ of Ambiguity Scale
~|D* cDb+ D3 ~¦gJH iÉ~{D* E ¤<bmD* EbgD* ]< 8b1 ~{+ *]K £E 9¡D* p- ¡J *& JH
fJxD* fBÉDb+ b& cgJ 9¡D* p- &* b£K cJxm- (comadena, 1984) "bJ2bE¡C" q~9H*& H Ix1*& f£<b/ °K b<*& H ¤GwD*
¤GwD* ~|D* $b.*& ¤A 4bA°& * E x£cC 2]< obgF(° |s~{D* £E ¥&*
9¡D* p- bc-4* E (Furnham & Avison, 1997) "¡~z£A%*H bFx£A" ]/H bE bgGÉD x£jD* EH
f£DbJx£~zD* ibE¡~6xD* ¡~¦J 9¡D* p- ¤-xE 8bs~7°& * &* *]/H ]A f£DbmD* iÉ£~¦gDb+
i°bg0°* ¢< bpK gE |s~{D* bC *3*( F*& IxF *& ~zD* A bK +b~6 bFxC3 ¥wD* rbgF°* pgD* *wG zJ ]BH
]cD* |s~{Db+ bFK b£0&* ~|- ¤gD* fc~|D* pgJ ]B F*& bC i*4b£sD* E ~6*H I]D ÉK pgE bK g0 ¡£~6 F(bA fgsD*
f/ E pgD* D (Rubenson & Runco, 1992) f£<bg/°* x£JbDb+ ygE x£= H&* -*3 ¡0 *yK CxgE ¡J &bC
b~¦K + ~¦cD 6bD* p- E ¡D* *wG ¡JH £J]£- x£= 8bs~7*& E EbgD* ]< ,x£cC f£B *3 ¡J ]B Ix1*&
64]D* f1 H&* obD* E ¢~7bg- ° f£~8&* 4bA*& ]cE : I]D ¡- bE]< 8b1 ~{+ fJ¡+xgD* B*¡D* ¤A bJK 4Hx~9
*]+°( *H ¤AbjD* 4¡gD bJK 4Hx~9 2]gD* ¡J k£0 gmD* ¤A ~6H&* bF ¢< ¡J &* J bC (Runco, 1991c)
(Richards, 1999; Florida, 2004)
|)b~|sD* f<¡mE &* h0° ]B ¡- b+xA ~zF*& *¡pgJ ¤D £<]cD* 8bs~7É& D E 9¡D* p- *& bC
¤gD* ib~zD* fAbC ]cD* |s~{D* ¤A xA¡g- *& ¥4Hx~¦D* E z£D F*& q£p~8 dJx= £1 ¤G £<]cD* y£- ¤gD* ib~zD*H
paradoxical personalities f~¦BbgD* ib£~|s~{D* ¢Q ~zJ b+ Hy£gJ *¡D*5bE £<]cD* $°¡' G D ~|D* *wG ¤A ixC3
6bD* ¦+ /*¡J ]BH (Barron & Harrington, 1981; Csikszentmihalyi, 1996) antimonies ib~¦BbgD* H&*
wG $b1(* "fJ]JHxD*" bA]D* ib£D%* E x£jC E ]D* bC ]A f£~|s~{D* ib~¦BbgD* wG dc~z+ f£E iÉ~{E
fJx: x££- b£< &* £C (Festinger, 1962) ¤AxD* xAbgD* < ,y£D* l¡pcD* hp~9H&* ]BH bQ 0 H&* iÉ~{D*
cg+ D q~zJ ]B £<]cD* 8bs~7&°* y£J ¥wD* pgDbA f£1*]D* ib<*x~|D* E f£E °K b~7*& dmgF ¢g0 bFx£-
8bs~7°& * |)b~|1 (Barron & Harrington ,1981) "¡gmJ4bG"H "H4b+" 2]< bE]<H f~¦BbgD* -b£~|s~7
i*wD* ¡E ¤A f~¦BbgD* H*& f~94bgD* ib~zD* eb£g~6* ¢< H&* ib~¦BbgD* 0 ¢< ,4]D*" ¢D*( *4b~7*& £<]cD*
exgF bE]< ib~¦BbgD* wG < £~|gD* E ]Jy+ l]pgF ¡~6H 8 "]cE |s~{D* &b+ h+bjD* 4¡~{D* *xK £1*& H
b-*3 pgD* f~6 E f~¦BbgE H]c- b~{BbF ¡~6 ¤gD* f£DbgD* f~zD*H ~|D* *wG fJbF E
f£~6b~zpD*
SENSITIVITY
b£+ f£~6b~zpD* E fJ2b< x£= ibJ¡g~zE ¡pF f£/¡D¡£+ f<yF £FbD *& (Greenacre, 1957) "xC*% bJx/" ]gJ
h<H f£~6b~zpD* E 4]B xA¡- dgJ 8¡~|sD* /H ¢< x~{D* *& (Sundaragan, in press) "b/ *4*]Fb~6" h<2*
fJx~{D* ])b~|D*" &* £C < (Owen, 1992, p. 302) "JH&*" ¡B h~zcgB*H $*¡~6 ]0 ¢< -$*xBH x~{D* f+bgC Dw+
rbgF°b+ Jx1%°* £<]cD*H £FbD* ¤A ,2b< 0É- ¤gD* f£~6b~zpD* h+4 bC "f£B]D* HxD* ¢D(* bcgF°* b-