Page 64 - bestpracticingiftededucation

63 (»YɪàL’G ´ƒædG) Qóæ÷G ¥hôa :™HGôdG π°üØdG

äÉ≤gGôªdG äÉ«àØ∏d á°UÉN ,§∏àîªdG ô«Z hCG §∏àîªdG º∏q ©à∏d áfRGƒàe ¢Uôa ô«aƒJ
.AGƒ°S óq M ≈∏Y äÉ«àØdGh ¿É«àØ∏d á«dÉY äÉ©bq ƒJ ôaGƒJ ¿Éª°V ™e ,äGô«¨°üdG

hGC ,äGòdG ôjó≤J á°ûbÉæªH äÉ«àØdGh ¿É«àØdG ø``e πq μd íª°ùJ ºYO äÉYƒªée ô``«aƒJ
.áeÉJ áMGô°üH iôNCG ÉjÉ°†b

’ PEG ;Ωƒ∏©dGh ,äÉ«°VÉjôdG :π``ãe ,åMÉѪ∏d »eGõdE’G hCG …QÉ«àN’G ™°VƒdG á``°SGQO
á∏MôªdG »a ø«àjQÉ«àNG ø«JOÉe -ºdn É©dG AÉëfCG º¶©e »a - Ωƒ∏©dGh äÉ«°VÉjôdG óq ©n Jo

.äÉ©eÉédÉH ¥Éëàd’G ¿hƒæj øjòdG ÜÓ£dG ≈dEG áÑ°ùædÉH á°UÉN ,ájƒfÉãdG
äGQÉÑàN’G ¢SÉ°SCG ≈∏Y Gk ô°üM òîàJ ᫪«∏©J äGQGôb hCG èeÉfôH …q CG Öæt éJ á``dhÉëe

.…QÉ«©ªdG AGO’C G äÉ°SÉ«b Ék °†jGC πª°ûJ ÜÓ£dG äÉØ∏e ¿q GC øe ócq ÉC àdGh ,áàbDƒªdG

™LGôŸG

Ablard, K. E., & Tissot, S. L. (1998). Young students’ readiness for advanced math-
ematics: Precocious abstract reasoning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,
21, 206–223.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning
ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.

Borkowski, J. (1990). “Small” gender differences on the SAT: A scenario about social
origins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 190–198.

Callahan, C. M., Cunningham, C. M., & Plucker, J. A. (1994). Foundations for the
future: The socio-emotional development of gifted, adolescent women. Ro-
eper Review, 17, 99–105.

Cramer, J., & Oshima, T. C. (1992). Do gifted females attribute their math perfor-
mance differently than other students? Journal for the Education of the Gifted,
16, 18–35.

Dickens, M. N., & Cornell, D. C. (1993). Parent influences on mathematics self-
concept of high ability adolescent girls. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,
17, 53–73.

Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psycholo-
gist, 41, 1040–1048.