Page 156 - THEHANDBOOKOFSecondaryGiftedEducation

155 ‫ لوألا ءزجلا‬- ‫باالر لصفلا‬

- Lobel, T. E., Nov-Krispin, N., Schiller, D., Lobel, O., and Feldman, A. (2004). Gender dis-
criminatory behavior during adolescence and young adulthood: A developmental analysis.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 535–546.

- Locker, J., and Cropley, M. (2004). Anxiety, depression and self-esteem in secondary
school children: An investigation into the impact of standard assessment tests (SATs) and
other important school examinations. School Psychology International, 25(3), 333–345.

- Marcia, J. (1980). Ego identity development. In J. Adelson (Ed.), The handbook of adoles-
¬cent psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.

- Marcia, J. (1987). The identity status approach to the study of ego identity development. In
T. Honess and K. Yardley (Eds.), Self and identity: Perspectives across the lifespan. London,
England: Routledge and Kagan Paul.

- Masten, C., Juvonen, J., and Spatzier, A. (2009). Relative Importance of parents and peers:
differences in academic and social behaviors at three grade levels spanning late child¬-
hood and early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(6), 773–799.

- Mattern, K. D., Shaw, E. J., and Xiong, X. (2009). The relationship between AP® exam per-
formance and college outcomes. College Board Research Report 2009–4. New York, NY:
The College Board.

- Maxwell, M. (2007). Career counseling is personal counseling: A constructivist approach to
nurturing the development of gifted female adolescents. The Career Development Quar-
terly, 55, 206–224.

- Mendaglio, S. (2012). Overexcitabilities and giftedness research: A call for a paradigm shift.
Journal for Education of the Gifted, 35, 207–219.

- Mickelson, R. A., and Greene, A. D. (2006). Connecting pieces of the puzzle: Gender dif-
ferences in Black middle school students’ achievement. The Journal of Negro Education,
75(1), 34–48.

- Moon, S. M. (2003). Personal talent. High Ability Studies.14 (1), 5–21.

- Moon, S. M. (2009). The Purdue Three-Stage Model. In B. Kerr. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of
giftedness, creativity, and talent (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

- Mullola, S., Ravaja, N., Lipsanen, J., Alatupa, S., Hintsanen, M., Jokela, M., Kelti-
kangas-Jarvinen, L. (2012). Gender differences in teachers’ perceptions of students’
tem¬perament, educational competence, and teachability. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 82(2), 185–206.

- Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O., and Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course
selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic
value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 323–345.

- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2009a). Average national assessment of edu¬-
cational progress (NAEP) mathematics scale score of high school graduates at grade 12,
by highest mathematics course taken in high school and selected student and school
char-acteristics: 2009 [Table163]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Re-
trieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_163.asp

- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2009b). Percentage distribution of elementary
and secondary school children, by average grades and selected child and school charac-
ter¬istics: 1996, 2003, 2007 [Table 176]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_176.asp

- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011a). Digest of educational statistics: 2011.
Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/
programs/digest/d11/

- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011b). The nation’s report card: America’s
high school graduates: Results of the NAEP 2009 high school transcript study. Washing-
ton, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nation-
sre¬portcard/pdf/studies/2011462.pdf