Page 157 - THEHANDBOOKOFSecondaryGiftedEducation

‫ المرجع في تربية الم ْوهوبين للمرحلة الثانو ّية‬156

- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2012a). ACT score averages and standard devi-
ations, by sex and race/ethnicity, and percentage of ACT test takers, by selected composite
score ranges and planned fields of study: Selected years, 1995 through 2012 [Table 175].
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/
programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_175.asp

- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2012b). Enrollment, staff, and degrees/cer-
tificates conferred in al postsecondary institutions participating in Title IV programs, by
level and control of institution, sex of student, type of staff, and type of degree: Fall 2010,
fall 2011, and 2010–11 [Table 219]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Re-
trieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_219.asp

- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2012c). SAT mean scores for college-bound
seniors, by sex: 166-67 through 2011–12 [Table 172]. Washington, DC: U.S. Govern-
ment Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/
dt12_172.asp

- National Science Board. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008 (Vol. 1, NSB 08-
01; Vol. 2, NSB 08-01A). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

- National Science Foundation. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in
science and engineering: 2009 (NSF 09-305). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from www.
nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.

- Neihart, M. (2006). Achievement/affiliation conflicts in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review,
28(4), 196–202.

- Nokelianen, P., Tirri, K., and Merenti-Valimaki, H. L. (2007). Investigating the influence
of attribution styles on the development of mathematical talent. Gifted Child Quarterly,
51(1), 64–81.

- Novakovic, A., and Fouad, N. A. (2013). Background, personal, and environmental influ-
ences on the career planning of adolescent girls. Journal of Career Development, 40(3),
223–244.

- Phillips, D. A. (1987). Socialization of perceived academic competence among highly
competent children. Child Development, 58, 1308–1320.

- Quinn, D. M., and Spencer, S. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women’s
generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 55–71.

- Reis, S. M. (1987). We can’t change what we don’t recognize: Understanding the special
needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(2), 83–88.

- Reis, S. M. (1995). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying gifted-
ness in females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(3), 162–170.

- Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone: Compromises and challenges of talented females.
Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

- Reis, S. M. (2001). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. In M. Bloom
and T. Gullotta (Eds.), Promoting creativity across the life span (pp. 231–276). Washington,
DC: CWLA.

- Reis, S. M. (2005). Feminist perspectives on talent development: A research based con-
ception of giftedness in women. In R. J. Sternberg and J. Davidson (Eds.). Conceptions of
Giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.

- Reis, S. M., and Callahan, C. M. (1989). Gifted females: They’ve come a long way—or have
they? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12(2), 99–117.

- Reis, S. M., and Callahan, C. M. (1994). Attitudes of adolescent gifted girls and boys toward
education, achievement, and the future. Gifted Education International, 9(3), 144–151.

- Reis, S. M., Hébert, T. P., Díaz, E. I., Maxfield, L. R., and Ratley, M. E. (1995). Case studies
of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school (RM 95120).
Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecti-
cut.