Page 158 - THEHANDBOOKOFSecondaryGiftedEducation

157 ‫ لوألا ءزجلا‬- ‫باالر لصفلا‬

- Reis, S. M., and McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do
we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170.

- Reis, S. M., and Park, S. (2001). Gender differences in high-achieving students in math and
science. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(1), 52–73.

- Reis, S. M., and Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional devel-
opment of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in
the Schools, 41(1), 119–130.

- Renzulli, J. S., and Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive
plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

- Renzulli, J. S., and Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how to guide for
educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

- Renzulli, J. S., and Reis, S. M. (2012). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A focus on stu-
dent creative productivity, strengths, and interests. In Callahan, C. M., and Hertberg-Da-
vis, H. (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp.
199–211). New York, NY: Routledge.

- Rimm, S. (1999). See Jane win. New York, NY: Random House.

- Rinn, A. N. (2006). Effects of a summer program on the social self-concepts of gifted ad-
olescents. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 65–75.

- Rinn, A. N., McQueen, K. S, Clark, G. L, and Rumsey, J. L. (2008). Gender differences in
gifted adolescents’ math/verbal self-concepts and math/verbal achievement: Implica-
tions for the STEM fields. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(1), 34–53.

- Rosser, P. (1989). Sex bias in college admissions tests: Why women lose out. Cambridge,
MA: National Center for Fair and Open Testing.

- Rubenstein, L. D., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M. McCoach, D. B., and Burton, M. G. (2012). A com-
plex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted
students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678–694.

- Rubie-Davies, C. M., Peterson, E., Irving, E., Widdowson, D., and Dixon, R. (2010). Ex-
pectations of achievement: Student, teacher and parent perceptions. Research in Educa-
tion, 83(1), 36–53.

- Rudasill, K. M., and Callahan, C. M. (2010). Academic self-perceptions of ability and
course planning among academically advanced students. Journal of Advanced Academics,
21(2), 300–329.

- Rudasill, K. M., Capper, M. R., Foust, R. C., Callahan, C. M., and Albaugh, S. B. (2009).
Grade and gender differences in gifted students’ self-concepts. Journal for the Education
of the Gifted, 32(3), 340–367.

- Ryan, K. E., and Ryan, A. M. (2005). Psychological processes underlying stereotype threat
and standardized math test performance. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 53–63.

- Ryan, A. M., and Shim, S. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents’ social achieve-
ment goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology,
100(3), 672–687.

- Sathy, V., Barbuti, S., and Mattern, K. (2006). The new SAT © and trends in test performance.
New York, NY: The College Board. Retrieved from http://research.collegeboard.org/sites/
default/files/publications/2012/7/statisticalreport-2006-1-new-sat-trends.pdf

- Seon-Young, L., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., and Thomson, D. (2012a). The social compe-
tence of highly gifted math and science adolescents. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13,
185–197.

- Seon-Young, L., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., and Thomson, D. (2012b). Academically gifted
students’ perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quar-
terly, 56(2), 90–104.

- Siegle, D., Moore, M., Mann, R. L., and Wilson, H. E. (2010). Factors that influence in-ser-
vice and preservice teachers’ nominations of students for gifted and talented programs.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 337–360.