Page 166 - bestpracticingiftededucation
P. 166

165 AÉ°ü≤à°S’G ≈∏Y ¿ÉªFÉ≤dG º«∏©àdGh º∏q ©àdG :ô°ûY ÊÉãdG π°üØdG

King, A. (1995). Designing the instructional process to enhance critical thinking across
        the curriculum. Inquiring minds really do want to know: Using questions to
        teach critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 13–17.

Meador, K. S. (1994). The effect of synectics training on gifted and nongifted kin-
        dergarten students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 55–73.

Moar, D., & Taylor, P. C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in
        computerized classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teach-
        ing, 32, 839–854.

Moss, E. B. (1990). Social interaction and metacognitive development in gifted pre-
        schoolers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 16–20.

Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1993). Higher order instructional
        goals in secondary schools: Class, teacher, and school influences. American
        Educational Research Journal, 30, 523–553.

Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for defensible programs
        for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A comprehensive
        plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Roberts, C., Ingram, C., & Harris, C. (1992). The effects of special versus regular
        classroom programming on higher cognitive processes of intermediate el-
        ementary aged gifted and average ability students. Journal for the Education
        of the Gifted, 15, 332–343.

Shepardson, D. P. (1996). Social interactions and the mediation of science learning
        in two small groups of first graders. Journal of Research in Science Teach-
        ing, 33,159–178.

Wineburg, S. S. (1991). History problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes
        used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of
        Educational Psychology, 83, 73–
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171