Page 49 - HANDBOOKOFGIFTEDEDUCATION
P. 49

Ray, B. (1997). Home education across the United States:                      ‫ ق�ضايا وتحديات في تربية الطلاب الموهوبين‬44

    Family characteristics, student achievement, longitu-     Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1996). Inclusion: A guide
    dinal traits. Purcellville, VA: Home School Legal             for educators. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
    Defense Association.
                                                              Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason
Reis, S. M., & Callahan, C. (1989). Gifted females:               exceptionally well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg
                                                                  & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness
    They’ve come a long way—or have they? Journal for             (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University
    the Education of the Gifted, 12, 99–117.                      Press.
Reis, S., & McCoach, B. (2000). The underachievement of
                                                              Stepien, W., Gallagher, S. A., & Workman, D. (1993).
    gifted students: What do we know and where do we              Problem-based learning for traditional and interdisci-
                                                                  plinary classrooms. Journal for the Education of the
    go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170.                      Gifted, 16(4), 5–17.
Rimm, S. (1997). Underachievement syndrome: A na-
                                                              Sternberg, R. (2000). Patterns of giftedness: A triarchic
    tional epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.),           analysis. Roeper Review, 22, 231–240.

    Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 416–434).      Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. (1993). Creative giftedness: A
    Boston: Allyn & Bacon.                                        multivariate investment approach. Gifted Child
                                                                  Quarterly, 37, 7–15.
Robinson, N. M., Weinberg, R. A., Redden, D., Ramey,
                                                              Stevenson, H., Lee, S., & Chen, C. (1994). Education of
    S. L., & Ramey, C. T. (1998). Factors associated with         gifted and talented students in mainland China, Taiwan,
                                                                  and Japan. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17,
    high academic competence among former Head Start              104–130.

    children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 148–156.            Terman, L., & Oden, M. H. (1947). The gifted child grows
Robinson, N., Zigler, E., & Gallagher, J. (2000). Two tails
                                                                  up: Twenty-five years follow-up of a superior group
    of the normal curve: Similarities and differences in the      (Vol. 4). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    study of mental retardation and giftedness. American      The Third International Mathematics and Science Study
    Psychologist, 55, 1413–1424.                                  (TIMSS). (1997). Washington, DC: U.S. Department
Ross, P. (1993). National excellence: The case for devel-         of Education.
    oping America’s talent. Washington, DC: U.S.
    Department of Education.                                  Tyler-Wood, T., Mortenson, M., Putney, D., & Cass, M.
                                                                  (2000). An effective mathematics and sciences curricu-
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1996). Beyond gifted education:                 lum option for secondary gifted education. Roeper
                                                                  Review, 22(4), 266–269.
    Building a shared agenda for school reform. Journal
    for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 194–214.             VanTassel-Baska, J. (1997). What matters in curriculum
Sayler, M., & Brookshire, W. (1993). Social, emotional,           for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research and
                                                                  practice. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook
    and behavioral adjustment of accelerated students, stu-       of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 126–135). Boston:
                                                                  Allyn & Bacon.
    dents in gifted classes, and regular students in eighth
                                                              Westberg, K., Archambault, F., Dobyns, S., & Salvin, T.
    grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 150–154.                   (1993). The classroom practices observation study.
Schunk, D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation.         Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120–146.

    Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 337–345.           Whitmore, J. (1980). The etiology of underachievement in
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian              highly gifted young children. Journal for the Education
                                                                  of the Gifted, 3, 38–51.
    perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford
    University Press.

Southern, W., & Jones, E. (1991). The academic accelera-
    tion of gifted children. New York: Teachers College
    Press.

Sowell, E. (1993). Programs for mathematically gifted stu-

    dents: A review of empirical research. Gifted Child
    Quarterly, 37, 124–132.
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54