Page 87 - HANDBOOKOFGIFTEDEDUCATION
P. 87

References                                                                                   ‫ الوراثة والبيئة في الموهبة‬82

Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1996).            Epstein, S. (1998). Constructive thinking: The key to emo-
    Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: It           tional intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    was never there and already it’s vanishing. Journal of
    Counseling Psychology, 43, 65–76.                           Feldman, D. H. (1984). A follow-up of subjects scoring
                                                                    above 180 IQ in Terman’s genetic studies of genius.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to             Exceptional Children, 50, 518–523.
    “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO:
    Westview Press.                                             Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic
                                                                    Books.
Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the
    passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist,      Gardner, H. (1997). Six afterthoughts: Comments on
    56, 333–336.                                                    “Varieties of intellectual talents.” Journal of Creative
                                                                    Behavior, 31, 120–124.
Atkinson, J. W. (1978). Motivational determinants of intellec-
    tive performance and cumulative achievement. In J. W.       Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intel-
    Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Personality, motivation,        ligences in the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
    and achievement (pp. 221–242). New York: Wiley.
                                                                Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why it can
Austin, J. H. (1978). Chase, chance, and creativity. New            matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
    York: Columbia University Press.
                                                                Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelli-
Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathe-                gence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and
    matics and science of students between ages 13 and 23:          bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23.
    Are there differences among students in the top one
    percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational     Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children
    Psychology, 84, 51–61.                                          turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.

Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1995). Longitudinal studies of per-       Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve:
    sonality and intelligence: A behavior genetic and evo-          Intelligence and class structure in American life. New
    lutionary psychology perspective. In D. H. Saklofske            York: Free Press.
    & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of per-
    sonality and intelligence (pp. 81–106). New York:           Holahan, C. K., & Sears, R. S. (1995). The gifted group in
    Plenum.                                                         later maturity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1997). IQ similarity in twins reared      Holden, C. (1987, April). Creativity and the troubled mind.
    apart: Findings and responses to critics. In R. J.              Psychology Today, 21, 9–10.
    Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, he-
    redity, and environment (pp. 126–160). New York:            Howe, M. J. A. (1999). Psychology of high abilities. New
    Cambridge University Press.                                     York: New York University Press.

Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, R., McGue,       Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A
    M. (1996). Genes, drives, environment, and experi-              comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity
    ence: EPD theory revised. In C. P. Benbow & D.                  of the graduate record examinations: Implications for
    Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent (pp. 5–43).                graduate student selection and performance.
    Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.                      Psychological bulletin, 127, 162–181.

Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, re-         Lens, W., & Rand, P. (2000). Motivation and cognition:
    ward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis.                Their role in the development of giftedness. In K. A.
    Review of Educational Research, 64, 363–423.                    Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik
                                                                    (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent
Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. G. (2000). Counseling                (2nd ed., pp. 193–202). Oxford: Elsevier.
    gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J.
    Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International           Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighbor-
    handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 595–            hoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood resi-
    607). Oxford: Elsevier.                                         dence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological
                                                                    Bulletin, 126, 309–337.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person:
    A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),     Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow,
    The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York:               C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of
    Cambridge University Press.                                     the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology,
                                                                    86, 718–729.

                                                                Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92