Page 88 - HANDBOOKOFGIFTEDEDUCATION

83 ‫المرجع في تربية الموهوبين‬
the creativity and madness controversy. New York:
Guilford Press.
Marsh, H. W. (1992). Content specificity of relations be-
tween academic achievement and academic self-con-
cept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 35–42.
Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L.
(1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on
academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again.
American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285–319.
McGrew, K. S., Keith, T. Z., Flanagan, D. P., &
Vanderwood, M. (1997). Beyond g: The impact of
gf-gc specific cognitive abilities research on the future
use and interpretation of intelligence tests in schools.
School Psychology Review, 26, 189–210.
Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreand,
K. L., Dies, R. R., Eisman, E. J., Kubiszin, T. W., &
Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psycho-
logical assessment: A review of evidence and issues.
American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.
Oden, M. H. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: Forty-
year follow up of the Terman group. Genetic
Psychology Monographs, 77, 3–93.
Pastore, N. (1949). The nature-nurture controversy. New
York: Kings Crown Press.
Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (1983). The Colorado adop-
tion project. Child Development, 54, 276–289.
Plomin, R., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., & Howe, G. W.
(1994). Nature and nurture: Genetic contributions to
measures of the family environment. Developmental
Psychology, 3, 32–43.
Ramos-Ford, V., & Gardner, H. (1997). Giftedness from a
multiple intelligences perspective. In N. Colangelo &
G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd
ed., pp. 54–66). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Richards, R. L. (1981). Relationships between creativity
and psychopathology: An evaluation and interpretation
of the evidence. Genetic Psychology Monographs,
103, 261–324.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1989). Discovering. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Rowe, D. C. (1994). The limits of family influence. New
York: Guilford.
Rowe, D. C. (2001). The nurture assumption persists.
American Psychologist, 56, 168–169.
Rushton, J. P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior. New
Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Salovey, P., & Sluyter, D. J. (Eds). (1997). Emotional de-
velopment and emotional intelligence: Educational
implications. New York: Basic Books.
Scarr, S. (1996). How people make their own environ-
ments: Implications for parents and policy makers.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 204–228.
Schroeder-Davis, S. (1996). Anti-intellectualism in sec-
ondary schools: The problem continues. Gifted
Education Press Quarterly, 10(2), 2–8.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Rankin, R. J. (1995). A test of the in-
ternal/external frame of reference model at different
levels of math and verbal self-perception. American
Educational Research Journal, 32, 161–184.
Stanley, J. C. (1997). Varieties of intellectual talent.
Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 93–119.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York:
Simon and Schuster.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelli-
gence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 1–25.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1962). Adolescent attitudes toward
academic brilliance. New York: Bureau of Publications,
Teachers College, Columbia University.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1996). The IQ controversy and the
gifted. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.),
Intellectual talent (pp. 44–77). Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1.
Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted chil-
dren. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of
genius: Vol. 5. Thirty-five years follow-up of the supe-
rior child. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Thompson, L. A., & Plomin, R. (2000). Genetic tools for
exploring individual differences in intelligence. In
K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, and R. F.
Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness
and talent (2nd ed., pp. 157–164). Oxford: Elsevier.
Traub, J. (1998, October 26). Multiple intelligence disor-
der. The New Republic (pp. 20–23).
Udvari, S. J., & Rubin, K. H. (1996). Gifted and non-se-
lected children’s perceptions of academic achievement,
academic effort, and athleticism. Gifted Child
Quarterly, 40, 211–219.
Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their
role in a positive psychology. American Psychologist,
55, 89–98.
Vispoel, W. P. (1995). Self-concept in artistic domains: An
extension of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton
(1976) model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87,
134–153.