Page 159 - HANDBOOKOFGIFTEDEDUCATION
P. 159

J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., & Urbina, S. (1996).                             ‫ العلاقة بين الوراثة والذكاء‬154
    Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American
    Psychologist, 51, 77–101.                                   Plomin, R., & Thompson, L. A. (1993). Genetics and high
                                                                    cognitive ability. In G. R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.),
Oden, M. H. (1968). The fullfillment of promise: 40 year            The origins and development of high ability (pp. 62–
    follow-up of the Terman gifted group. Genetic                   84). Chichester, UK: Wiley (CIBA Foundation
    Psychology Monographs, 77, 3–93.                                Symposium 178).

Pedersen, N. L., Plomin, R., Nesselroade, J. R., &              Price, T. S., Eley, T. C., Petrill, S. A., & Plomin, R. (2001).
    McClearn, G. E. (1992). A quantitative genetic analy-           Longitudinal genetic analysis of specific cognitive
    sis of cognitive abilities during the second half of the        abilities in pre-school children. Submitted.
    life span. Psychological Science, 3, 346–353.
                                                                Rowe, D. C. (1994). The limits of family influence: Genes,
Petrill, S. A. (1997). Molarity versus modularity of cogni-         experience, and behaviour. New York: Guilford.
    tive functioning? A behavioral genetic perspective.
    Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 96–99.      Salthouse, T. A., & Czaja, S. J. (2000). Structural con-
                                                                    straints on process explanations in cognitive aging.
Plomin, R. (1986). Development, genetics, and psychol-              Psychology and Aging, 15, 44–55.
    ogy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
                                                                Scarr, S. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s:
Plomin, R. (1988). The nature and nurture of cognitive              Development and individual differences. Child
    abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psy-       Development, 63, 1–19.
    chology of human intelligence. Vol. 4 (pp. 1–33).
    Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.                                     Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. (1978). The influence of “fam-
                                                                    ily background” on intellectual attainment. American
Plomin, R. (1991). Genetic risk and psychosocial disor-             Sociological Review, 43, 674–692.
    ders: Links between the normal and abnormal. In M.
    Rutter & P. Casaer (Eds.), Biological risk factors for      Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidi-
    psychosocial disorders (pp. 101–138). Cambridge:                mensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process.
    Cambridge University Press.                                     Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 39–
                                                                    43.
Plomin, R. (1994). Genetics and experience: The interplay
    between nature and nurture. Thousand Oaks, CA:              Snyderman, M., & Rothman, S. (1987). Survey of expert
    Sage Publications.                                              opinion on intelligence and aptitude testing. American
                                                                    Psychologist, 42, 137–144.
Plomin, R. (1999). Genetics and general cognitive ability.
    Nature, 402, C25–C29.                                       Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of
                                                                    human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Plomin, R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1991). The nature of nur-            Press.
    ture: Genetic influences on “environmental” measures.
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 373–427.                 Sternberg, R. J., & Gardner, M. K. (1983). A componential
                                                                    interpretation of the general factor in human intelli-
Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the           gence. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for intelligence.
    same family so different from each other? Behavioral            Berlin: Springer Verlag.
    and Brain Sciences, 10, 1–16.
                                                                Thompson, L. A., Detterman, D. K., & Plomin, R. (1991).
Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (1998, May). Genetics of               Associations between cognitive abilities and scholastic
    cognitive abilities and disabilities. Scientific American,      achievement: Genetic overlap but environmental dif-
    62–69.                                                          ferences. Psychological Science, 2, 158–165.

Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Nature      Vernon, P. A. (1993). Biological approaches to the study of
    and nurture during infancy and early childhood.                 human intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
                                                                Wadsworth, S. J. (1994). School achievement. In R.
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin,            Plomin & D. W. Fulker (Eds.), Nature and nurture dur-
    P. (2001). Behavioral genetics (4th ed.). New York:             ing middle childhood (pp. 86–101). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Worth.

Plomin, R., Owen, M. J., & McGuffin, P. (1994). The ge-
    netic basis of complex human behaviors. Science, 264,
    1733–1739.
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164