Page 35 - HANDBOOKOFGIFTEDEDUCATION
P. 35

References                                                                                          ‫ تقديم ومراجعة‬30

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequality in equity:      lence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
    How “equity” can lead to inequity for high potential       Sears, P. S. (1979). The Terman genetic studies of genius,
    students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249–
    292.                                                           1922–1972. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the
                                                                   talented (pp. 75–96). Chicago: National Society for the
Bloom, B. S., & Sosniak, L. A. (1981). Talent development          Study of Education.
    vs. schooling. Educational Leadership, 39, 86–94.          Sears P. S., & Barbee, A. H. (1977). Career and life satis-
                                                                   factions among Terman’s gifted women. In J. C.
First Official U.S. Education Mission to the USSR. (1959).         Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The
    Soviet commitment to education. Bulletin 1959, No.             gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective (pp.
    16. Washington, DC: Office of Education, U.S.                  28–65). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Department of Health, Education and Welfare.               Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., & Stevens, R. J. (1990).
                                                                   Cooperative learning models for the 3 R’s. Educational
Gallagher, J. J., & Weiss, P. (1979). The education of gifted      Leadership, 47(4), 22–29.
    and talented children and youth. Washington, DC:           Stanley, J. C. (1976). Concern for intellectually talented
    Council for Basic Education.                                   youths: How it originated and fluctuated. Journal of
                                                                   Clinical Child Psychology, 5, 38–42.
Gardner, J. W. (1982). Excellence: Can we be equal and         Starko, A. J. (1990). Life and death of a gifted program:
    excellent too? (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.                    Lessons not yet learned. Roeper Review, 13, 33–38.
                                                               Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986).
Getzels, J. W. (1977). General discussion immediately              Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge
    after the Terman Memorial Symposium. In J. C.                  University Press.
    Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The          Tannenbaum, A. J. (1979). Pre-Sputnik to post-Watergate
    gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective (pp.         concern about the gifted. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The
    225–269). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.           gifted and the talented (pp. 5–27). Chicago: National
                                                                   Society for the Study of Education.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream silence on intelli-      Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1.
    gence: An editorial with 52 signatures, history, and           Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted chil-
    bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13–22.                      dren. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
                                                               Terman, L. M., Burks, B. S., & Jensen, D. W. (1930).
Goldberg, M. L. (1956). Research on the talented. New
    York: Bureau of Publications, Columbia University.             Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 3. The promise of youth:
                                                                   Follow-up studies of a thousand gifted children.
Goleman, D. (1980). 1,528 little geniuses and how they             Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    grew. Psychology Today, 13(9), 28–43.                      Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). Genetic studies of
                                                                   genius: Vol. 4. The gifted child grows up. Stanford:
Good, H. G. (1960). A history of western education (2nd            Stanford University Press.
    ed.). New York: Macmillan.                                 Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of
                                                                   genius: Vol. 5. The gifted group at midlife: Thirty-five
Hollingworth, L. S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature          years’ follow-up of a superior group. Stanford:
    and nurture. New York: Macmillan.                              Stanford University Press.
                                                               Treffinger, D. J., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Talent recog-
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ                  nition and development: Successor to gifted education.
    Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. New York:              Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 181–193.
    World Book.                                                Tsuin-Chen, O. (1961). Some facts and ideas about talent
                                                                   and genius in Chinese history. In G. Z. F. Bereday &
Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification           J. A. Lauwerys (Eds.), Concepts of excellence in edu-
    and mobility in American high schools. New York:               cation: The yearbook of education. New York:
    Teachers College Press.                                        Harcourt, Brace and World.
                                                               U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Newland, T. E. (1976). The gifted in historical perspective.       (1972). Education of the gifted and talented.
    Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.                           Washington, DC: Author.
                                                               U.S. Department of Education, National Commission on
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track. New Haven, CT: Yale               Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The
    University Press.                                              imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC:
                                                                   Author.
Reis, S. M., Westberg, K., Kulikowich, J., Caillard, F.,       U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational
    Herbert, T., Purcell, J., Rogers, J., & Smist, J. (1992,       Research and Improvement. National Excellence: A
    April). Modifying regular classroom instruction with           case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC:
    curriculum compacting. In J. S. Renzulli (Chair),              Author.

    Regular classroom practices with gifted students:

    Findings from the National Research Center on the
    Gifted and Talented. Symposium conducted at the an-
    nual meeting of the American Educational Research
    Association, San Francisco.
Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The National Research Center on
    the Gifted and Talented: The dream, the design, and the
    destination. Gifted Children Quarterly, 35, 73–80.
Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A
    practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield
    Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrich-

    ment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excel-
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40